Many copies of RHEL are actually installed (see §10) - presumably for the Hat even reserves the right to “Review” a customer (effectively a BSA-style audit) to examine how In some versions of these contracts that we have reviewed, Red
INKSCAPE ORG SOFTWARE
To choose between (a) their software freedom and rights, and (b) remaining a Red HatĬustomer. In essence, Red Hat requires their customers
INKSCAPE ORG UPDATE
Right to cancel that contract and make no further contracts with theĬustomer for support and update services. If the customer engages in these activities, that Red Hat reserves the Additionally, though, the contract indicates that Redistribute and/or reinstall the software as many times and as many placesĪs the customer likes (see §1.4). That the terms do not intend to contradict any rights to copy, modify, Specifically, IBM's Red Hat offers copies of RHEL to itsĬustomers, and each copy comes with a support and automatic-update “if you exercise your rights under the GPL, your money is no good The most concise and pithy way to describe RHEL's business model is: Recent events show that the behavior has simply gotten worse, and is likely to get even “open secret” until now because we all had hoped that Red Hat's behavior Activists have found this discussionįrustrating, but kept the nature and tenure of these discussions as an Seriously listened to by key members of Red Hat's legal and OSPOĭepartments, and even by key C-level executives, but they have ultimately been rejectedĪnd ignored - sometimes even with a “fine, then sue us for GPL These pleadings,ĭiscussions, and encouragements have, as far as we can tell, been heard and Including SFC, have spent decades talking to Red Hat and itsĪttorneys about how the Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) business model courtsĬommunity-oriented Free and Open Source Software (FOSS). Nonetheless complies with the GPL and other standard copyleft IBM) has experimented with building a business model for operating system deployment andĭistribution that looks, feels, and acts like a proprietary one, but The related source code provisioning, and the GPL compliance issues with RHEL.įor approximately twenty years, Red Hat (now a fully owned subsidiary of We hope that this will serve as a comprehensiveĭocument that discusses the history of Red Hat's RHEL business model, Prior discontinuation of CentOS Linux (which are related events, asĭescribed below). Red Hat's change to no longer publish complete, corresponding source This article was originally published primarily as a response A Comprehensive Analysis of the GPL Issues With the Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) Business Model
0 kommentar(er)
